Most Active Stories
- Utah Dad Goes Undercover Over The Weekend To Save Enslaved Children In Colombia
- Gluten Intolerance Debunked, Gluten-Free Marketing Thrives
- UPR Fundraising Dinner November 13 in Logan Featuring NPR Science Correspondent Joe Palca
- Vandal Defiles National Parks Across The West
- USU Researchers Study Streams And Climate In The West
Tue June 24, 2014
Research Shines Light On Gardening Question
Though the sun is still the primary source of light for most gardeners, many rely on electric lights some of the time. But varying claims on the efficiency of these lights from different manufacturers has left many growers confused about which products to use, according to Bruce Bugbee.
Bugbee, a professor in Utah State University’s College of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, along with graduate student Jacob Nelson decided to look into these claims, publishing an article on the topic in the journal PLOS ONE.
They compared 22 different kinds of lights, including LEDs, fluorescents, ceramic metal halides and high pressure sodium fixtures, the kind of lights used in street lamps.
“The very best technologies were high pressure sodium lights and LEDS are also excellent, except they are really expensive,” Bugbee said.
He said the research showed LEDs cost 5 to 10 times as much money per unit of light compared to the high pressure sodium lights, mostly due to replacement costs.
Coming in last for efficiency were florescent lights, said Bugbee.
Overall, the type of light a grower should use depends on how their greenhouse is set up. Bugbee explained the high pressure sodium lights shine light over a broad area, whereas LEDs are more like tiny, directed spotlights.
“For big growers, I think the high pressure sodium lamps are still the best technology, the LEDs need to come down in price before they are the best technology,” Bugbee said. “But, for home owners it’s a different story.”
He said if home gardeners have a small greenhouse, LEDS can be the best choice.